Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 995 P.2d 682.

1245 citing documents.

Easter D. v. Dcs, S.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., -49, ¶¶ 11-12 (2000).
Melaney L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Melaney L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., –49, ¶¶ 11–12 (2000).
Steven H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Steven H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Robert L. v. Dcs, A.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Robert L. v. Dcs, A.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Abelina L. v. Dcs, R.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Carl P. v. Dcs, C.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jennifer B. v. Jesse E., J.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jennifer B. v. Jesse E., J.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Carl P. v. Dcs, C.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., -52, ¶ 29 (2000), the juvenile court found termination of Father’s parental rights was warranted on the grounds of his length of incarceration, see A.R.S.
Abelina L. v. Dcs, R.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 22 (2005).
Jacoree D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jacoree D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Juan F. v. Erica C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Juan F. v. Erica C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
sets forth non-exclusive factors the court must consider when determining whether the length of a felony sentence sufficiently deprives a child of “a normal home for a period of years.” –52, ¶ 29 (2000).
Sarah D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sarah D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Antonio R. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Antonio R. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Matthew B., Amanda R. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Matthew B., Amanda R. v. Dcs, J.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kaleb P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kaleb P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Javier v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Luis C. v. Nicole T., A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Luis C. v. Nicole T., A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 25 (2000) (“The burden to act as a parent rests with the parent, who should assert his legal rights at the first and every opportunity.”).
Javier v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 22 (2005).
Demetrice H. v. Dcs, D.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Demetrice H. v. Dcs, D.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Anazi S. v. Dcs, L.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Anazi S. v. Dcs, L.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., -49, ¶¶ 11- 12 (2000).
Juan P. v. Dcs, S.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Juan P. v. Dcs, S.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Erika C. v. Dcs, I.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Erika C. v. Dcs, I.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., –49 ¶¶ 11–12 (2000).
Tasha R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tasha R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Mario B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Mario B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Enrique N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Enrique N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 22 (2005).
Jesse M. v. Dcs, G.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Paradise L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jesse M. v. Dcs, G.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Paradise L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Troy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Troy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aaron F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021