Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 995 P.2d 682.

1245 citing documents.

Aaron F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jessica R. v. Dcs, B.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jessica R. v. Dcs, B.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Victor K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Victor K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Nelturiah S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Cindy M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Cindy M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., -49, ¶¶ 11- 12 (2000).
Nelturiah S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 22 (2005).
Andrea F., Joshua W. v. Dcs, E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Andrea F., Joshua W. v. Dcs, E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), as long as the procedures are fair and satisfy due process requirements, Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 284, ¶ 24.
Gordon O., Karrie O. v. Kiley O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gordon O., Karrie O. v. Kiley O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tara R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tara R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brandi C., Jesse G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brandi C., Jesse G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, B.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, B.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), which include chronic substance abuse, A.R.S.
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sarah B. v. Dcs, K.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sarah B. v. Dcs, K.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., -49, ¶¶ 11-12 (2000).
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., -49, ¶¶ 11- 12 (2000).
Lara S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lara S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Asaunte W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
David B. v. Dcs, A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Asaunte W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
David B. v. Dcs, A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 27 (2000) (appellate court need not address other statutory grounds for terminating parent’s rights if there is sufficient evidence of one ground).
Harold B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Harold B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Riquelmer M. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cindy M. v. Claudio H., C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cindy M. v. Claudio H., C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Riquelmer M. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that termination is in the best interests of the child.
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Roseann R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Michael J., –52, ¶ 29 (2000).
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Charles v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Charles v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shea G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shea G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000); accord Ariz. R. P. Juv.
Leticia P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tiffany L. v. Dcs, I.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brianna R., Jordan M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brianna R., Jordan M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Leticia P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000); accord Ariz. R.P.