Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 995 P.2d 682.

1269 citing documents.

Luis C. v. Nicole T., A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Luis C. v. Nicole T., A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 25 (2000) (“The burden to act as a parent rests with the parent, who should assert his legal rights at the first and every opportunity.”).
Javier v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 22 (2005).
Demetrice H. v. Dcs, D.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Demetrice H. v. Dcs, D.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Anazi S. v. Dcs, L.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Anazi S. v. Dcs, L.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., -49, ¶¶ 11- 12 (2000).
Juan P. v. Dcs, S.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Juan P. v. Dcs, S.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Erika C. v. Dcs, I.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Erika C. v. Dcs, I.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., –49 ¶¶ 11–12 (2000).
Tasha R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tasha R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Mario B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Mario B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Enrique N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Enrique N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 22 (2005).
Jesse M. v. Dcs, G.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Paradise L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jesse M. v. Dcs, G.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Paradise L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Troy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Troy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aaron F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aaron F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jessica R. v. Dcs, B.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jessica R. v. Dcs, B.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Victor K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Victor K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Nelturiah S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Cindy M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Cindy M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., -49, ¶¶ 11- 12 (2000).
Nelturiah S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), and find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that termination is in the best interests of the child, ¶ 22 (2005).
Andrea F., Joshua W. v. Dcs, E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Andrea F., Joshua W. v. Dcs, E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), as long as the procedures are fair and satisfy due process requirements, Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 284, ¶ 24.
Gordon O., Karrie O. v. Kiley O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gordon O., Karrie O. v. Kiley O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tara R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Tara R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brandi C., Jesse G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brandi C., Jesse G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, B.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, B.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 12 (2000), which include chronic substance abuse, A.R.S.
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sarah B. v. Dcs, K.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sarah B. v. Dcs, K.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., -49, ¶¶ 11-12 (2000).
Desiree v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., -49, ¶¶ 11- 12 (2000).
Lara S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lara S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Asaunte W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020