Cited by

ertion, (2) appellant has raised “at least 3 WOOD v. DRAPKIN Decision of the Court a grave doubt” about the superior court’s order, or (3) the appeal raises novel legal questions

When there was “at least grave doubt” about the superior court’s order, the court also found a debatable question, and our courts have found debatable issues when an appeal raised novel legal questions, see

est for debatable issues, they have found them to exist when: (1) it "would require much industry and independent research to refute [appellant's] position," (2) "there is at least grave doubt" about the superior court's order, –32 (1932); or (3) an appeal raises novel legal questions

¶7 Five years later, our supreme court described Wheeler as "notif[ying] the bar of this state that, upon a failure on the part of the appellee to file with the court a brief to sustain his side of the case, we would conclude 'that his attitude is a confession of the error assigned by [the] appellant.'" (quoting Wheeler, 17 Ariz. at 350).

187 P. 573 (1920); Counterman v. Counterman, 6 Ariz.App.