Cited by

When there was “at least grave doubt” about the superior court’s order, the court also found a debatable question, and our courts have found debatable issues when an appeal raised novel legal questions, see

est for debatable issues, they have found them to exist when: (1) it "would require much industry and independent research to refute [appellant's] position," (2) "there is at least grave doubt" about the superior court's order, –32 (1932); or (3) an appeal raises novel legal questions

¶7 Five years later, our supreme court described Wheeler as "notif[ying] the bar of this state that, upon a failure on the part of the appellee to file with the court a brief to sustain his side of the case, we would conclude 'that his attitude is a confession of the error assigned by [the] appellant.'" (quoting Wheeler, 17 Ariz. at 350).

187 P. 573 (1920); Counterman v. Counterman, 6 Ariz.App.