Cited by

¶37 “Property takes its character as separate or community at the time of acquisition and retains that character throughout the marriage.” Bell–Kilbourn v. Bell–Kilbourn, ¶ 5 (App. 2007).

¶ 4 (App. 2018) (parenting time); ¶ 9 (App. 2016) (child support); ¶ 9 (App. 2007) (spousal maintenance); ¶ 4 (App. 2007) (division of community property).

¶ 8 (App. 2014); ¶ 4 (App. 2007).

–24, ¶¶ 7, 11 (App. 2007).

Estate of DeCamacho v. La Solana Care & Rehab, Inc., ¶ 9 (App. 2014); ¶ 4 (App. 2007).

¶ 1, n.1 (App. 2007); ¶ 13 (App. 1998).

at 93-94; ¶¶ 10-11 (App. 2007).

We review de novo purely legal questions, such as questions of statutory interpretation, ¶ 5 (App. 2018), and the court’s characterization of property as separate or community, ¶ 4 (App. 2007).

¶ 8 (App. 2012); ¶ 4 (App. 2007).

This court reviews legal conclusions de novo, id., including the characterization of property as separate or community, Bell–Kilbourn v. Bell–Kilbourn, ¶ 4 (App. 2007).

¶ 22 (App. 2014) (spousal maintenance); ¶ 4 (App. 2007) (allocation of property).