Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Walsh v. Walsh, 286 P.3d 1095.
- Crook v. Crook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Crook v. Crook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Tamara Camila Rivero Quinteros v. Anthony Celaya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Tamara Camila Rivero Quinteros v. Anthony Celaya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Smith v. Harter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Smith v. Harter
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 17 (App. 2022); ¶ 9 (App. 2012).
- Barnum v. Barnum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Barnum v. Barnum
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 24 (App. 2012) (“We will reverse only if the complaining party suffers prejudice as a result of the error.
- Brooksby v. Brooksby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Brooksby v. Brooksby
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
–95 ¶¶ 26–27 (App. 2012).
- Bondurant v. Yelle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Bondurant v. Yelle
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 9 (App. 2012) (a court abuses its discretion if it commits a substantial error of law).
- Kane v. Kane Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Kane v. Kane
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 24 (App. 2012) (“Not all errors in the superior court warrant reversal [].
- Zennaro v. Zennaro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Zennaro v. Zennaro
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to supporting the superior court’s decision, ¶ 9 (App. 2012), and uphold its decision if supported by substantial evidence
- Benninghoff v. Benninghoff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Benninghoff v. Benninghoff Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Garza v. Collinsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Garza v. Collinsworth
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“We will reverse only if the complaining party suffers prejudice as a result of the error.” ¶ 24 (App. 2012) (citation omitted).
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Z.L. 536 P.3d 266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to Z.L.
536 P.3d 266
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 24 (App. 2012) (stating this court will reverse only if a party suffers prejudice from the error, and the prejudice “appear[s] affirmatively from the record”) (internal quotation marks omitted).
- Litmath v. US Fire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Litmath v. US Fire
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶ 24 (App. 2012) (stating not all errors warrant reversal; this court will reverse only if a party suffers prejudice from the error, and the prejudice “appear[s] affirmatively from the record”).
- Alexander v. Stadsklev Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Alexander v. Stadsklev
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
The value of an asset “is a factual determination that must be based on the facts and circumstances of each case.” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (citation omitted).
- Rahimian v. Rahimian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Rahimian v. Rahimian
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (citation omitted).
- Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Smith v. Smith
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Law P. 86 (“At every stage of the proceeding, the court must disregard all errors and defects that do not affect any party’s substantial rights.”); ¶ 24 (App. 2012) (not all errors warrant reversal; this court will reverse only if a party suffers prejudice from the error, and the prejudice “appear[s] affirmatively in the record”).
- Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Jorden B. v. Dcs, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Moore v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Moore v. Moore
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 9 (App. 2012) (“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding
- Gagnon v. Greene Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Gagnon v. Greene
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2 “We view the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the decision.” ¶ 9 (App. 2012).
- Burney v. Huntimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Burney v. Huntimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Olson v. Olson, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Olson v. Olson, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Hinton v. Hinton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Hinton v. Hinton
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
- Menghini v. Menghini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Menghini v. Menghini
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
- Stevens v. Stevens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Stevens v. Stevens
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding.” ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (quotations omitted).
- Morris v. Morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Morris v. Morris
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
We review de novo the superior court’s classification of community and separate property, Pownall, 197 Ariz. at 581, ¶ 15, but uphold its factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, ¶ 9 (App. 2012).
- Wright v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Wright v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019