Cited by

“The [superior] court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the [superior] court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (quotation omitted).

¶17 “The [superior] court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the [superior] court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (quotation omitted).

¶ 5 (App. 2014); ¶ 14 (App. 2012).

A superior court abuses its discretion when the record is “devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

“The [superior] court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the [superior] court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (quotation omitted).

However, because Luis’s brief and this record demonstrate no debatable issues on appeal, “[i]n the exercise of our discretion, we decline to treat her failure to file an answering brief as a confession of error.” ¶ 4 n.3 (App. 2014).

Action No. J-65812-1, (“[W]e may, in our discretion, treat the lack of a response as a confession of error.”); (Failure to file an answering brief could be a confession of error.); ¶ 4, n.3 (App. 2014) (similar); McDowell Mountain Ranch Cmty.

Although Mother views the evidence differently, she has failed to show the record “is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

We "affirm where any reasonable view of the facts and law might support the judgment," City of Phoenix v. 3 and "review any legal questions de novo," ¶ 5 (App. 2014).

Action No. S-389, ) (Failure to file an answering brief could be a confession of error.); ¶ 4, n.3 (App. 2014) (similar); McDowell Mountain Ranch Cmty.

Co., 4 Ariz. App. at 285); ¶ 4 n.3 (App. 2014) ("In the exercise of our discretion, we decline to treat her failure to file an answering brief as a confession of error."); ¶ 4 n.1 (App. 2012) (noting we are "not required" to treat failure to file an answering brief as confession of reversible error)

¶ 4 n.3 (App. 2014) ("In the exercise of our discretion, we decline to treat her failure to file an answering brief as a confession of error.").

A trial court abuses its discretion when the record is “devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).

¶ 13 (App. 2014) (explaining it is an appellant’s responsibility to ensure the record contains material to which he takes exception).

A court abuses its discretion when “it makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion or ‘when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.’” ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).