Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Sorensen v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona, 957 P.2d 1007.
- DAVIS v. PRESCOTT Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- DAVIS v. PRESCOTT Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- ANDRICH v. THRASHER Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- ANDRICH v. THRASHER Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
- Clay v. Geiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Clay v. Geiser
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
of Ariz., (dismissing the appeal after finding the court did not have jurisdiction).
- Heshion v. Gentry Wealth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Heshion v. Gentry Wealth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Boatman v. Casey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Boatman v. Casey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Victor Sanchez-Ravuelta Janette Dodge v. Yavapai County Town of Dewey-Humboldt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
- Victor Sanchez-Ravuelta Janette Dodge v. Yavapai County Town of Dewey-Humboldt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
- Amanda Campion and James Campion v. City of Tucson 536 P.3d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
-
Amanda Campion and James Campion v. City of Tucson
536 P.3d 1232
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
Co. of Ariz., (denial of summary judgment is an intermediate order only deciding case should go to trial).
- Thompson v. Manten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Thompson v. Manten
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Co. of Ariz., –66 (App. 1997) (denial of motion for summary judgment is not appealable).
- Mestro v. Pasionek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Mestro v. Pasionek Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Cook v. McAllister Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Cook v. McAllister
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Co., (“Although neither party has raised the issue, this court has an independent duty to determine whether it has jurisdiction to consider an appeal.”).
- Aguilera v. Richer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Aguilera v. Richer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Tms v. Zachariah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Tms v. Zachariah
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Co. of Ariz., (“A denial of a motion for summary judgment is an intermediate order deciding simply that the case should go to trial.”); Powell-Cerkoney v. TCR-Mont.
- Hott v. Sommers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Hott v. Sommers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- 12th Street v. Lynaugh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- 12th Street v. Lynaugh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Blaser v. Kaiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Blaser v. Kaiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Hon kalauli/kroll 414 P.3d 690 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- State v. Hon kalauli/kroll 414 P.3d 690 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Unted v. Gammage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Unted v. Gammage Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- Petrocelli v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Petrocelli v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Ibrahim v. Eckel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Ibrahim v. Eckel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- William P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- William P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC 380 P.3d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- State v. Zarco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLC
380 P.3d 659
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co. of Ariz., , (noting appellate court has an independent duty to examine whether it has appellate jurisdiction over putative appeals), 3 *426 DISCUSSION I. Appellate Jurisdiction And Ariz. R. Civ.
-
State v. Zarco
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co. of Ariz., (noting appellate court has an independent duty to examine whether it has appellate jurisdiction over putative appeals).3 2 Although not the subject of this opinion, whether a ruling is a final judgment is significant apart from appellate jurisdiction, including for enforcement and preclusion purp
- Marc S. v. Robyn P./william P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Marc S. v. Robyn P./william P.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co. of Ariz., (noting appellate court has an independent duty to examine whether it has appellate jurisdiction over putative appeals).
- ades/butkivich v. Contreras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- ades/butkivich v. Contreras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Calderon v. Mennenga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Calderon v. Mennenga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016