Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite David Stambaugh v. Mark Killian, 398 P.3d 574.
-
GALLERY v. K HOVNANIAN
Ariz. 2026
“In construing a specific provision, we look to the statute as a whole and we may also consider statutes that are in pari materia—of the same subject or general purpose—for guidance and to give effect to all of the provisions involved.” ¶ 7 (2017).
-
A & P RANCH LTD v. COCHISE COUNTY
Ariz. 2026
In re Drummond, 257 Ariz. at 21 ¶ 19; ¶ 7 (2017).
- REPUBLICAN NATL COMMITTEE v. FONTES Ariz. 2026
-
Zarate v. Rios
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 7 (2017); see also State ex rel.
- State v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
State v. Hernandez
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶10 Although the word “trauma,” by itself, could reasonably be understood to refer to emotional as well as physical trauma, statutory terms “should be read in context in determining their meaning.” ¶ 7 (2017); see also Huber v. Ariz. Naturopathic Physicians Med.
- State of Arizona v. Hon. marner/haniffa Ariz. 2026
-
State of Arizona v. Hon. marner/haniffa
Ariz. 2026
¶30 “In construing a specific provision,” courts “look to the statute as a whole and we may also consider statutes that are in pari materia—of the same subject or general purpose—for guidance and to give effect to all of the provisions involved.” ¶ 7 (2017).
- In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to B.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
-
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to B.B.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
Opinion of the Court Killian, ).
- Lalliss v. National Liability Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Lalliss v. National Liability Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- NGUYEN v. STEPHENSON Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- NGUYEN v. STEPHENSON Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Arizona Cardinals v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Arizona Cardinals v. Ador
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
may also consider statutes that are in pari materia—of the same subject or general purpose—for guidance and to give effect to all of the provisions involved.” ¶ 7 (2017).
- State v. Bierbrodt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Frazer Ryan v. Mayne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Frazer Ryan v. Mayne
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
may also consider statutes that are in pari materia—of the same subject or general purpose—for guidance and to give effect to all of the provisions involved.” ¶ 7 (2017).
- State v. Bierbrodt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Club West v. Shea homes/the Edge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Club West v. Shea homes/the Edge
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 7 (2017) (“In construing a specific provision, we look to the statute as a whole[.]”).
- Fernando Navarro-Figueroa v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
-
Fernando Navarro-Figueroa v. State of Arizona
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
(we do not interpret statutes in manner that would render clause superfluous).
- In the Matter of William John Chalmers Ariz. 2025
-
In the Matter of William John Chalmers
Ariz. 2025
¶ 7 (2017) (“In construing a specific provision, we look to the statute as a whole and we may also consider statutes that are in pari materia—of the same subject or general purpose—for guidance and to give effect to all of the provisions 5 IN THE MATTER OF WILLI
- State Farm Automobile v. Jacey Lee Orlando Ariz. 2025
- State Farm Automobile v. Jacey Lee Orlando Ariz. 2025
- Arizona Preservation Foundation; Tucson Historic Preservation Foundation v. Pima Community College Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Arizona Preservation Foundation; Tucson Historic Preservation Foundation v. Pima Community College Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmark Ariz. 2025
-
Vande Krol v. superstition/benchmark
Ariz. 2025
When a statute’s plain language is unambiguous it is dispositive, id., and “we do not resort to other canons of statutory interpretation,” ¶ 17 (2017).
- Jane Doe I & II; And John Doe... v. Shaunice Warr 566 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Jane Doe I & II; And John Doe... v. Shaunice Warr 566 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
- Michael K. Reilly and Sierra Pipeline, LLC v. Philip L. Canale and Terra Canale 565 P.3d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
-
Michael K. Reilly and Sierra Pipeline, LLC v. Philip L. Canale and Terra Canale
565 P.3d 1066
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
¶10 Further, when “construing a specific provision, we look to the statute as a whole and we may also consider statutes that are in pari materia—of the same subject or general purpose—for guidance and to give effect to all of the provisions involved.” Drummond, (); see State ex rel.
- San Diego Gas v. Ador Ariz. 2025
-
San Diego Gas v. Ador
Ariz. 2025
When tasked with “construing a specific provision, we look to the statute as a whole and we may also consider statutes that are in pari materia—of the same subject or general purpose—for guidance and to give effect to all of the provisions involved.” ¶ 7 (2017).
- Sierra Club v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
-
Sierra Club v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Opinion of the Court ¶20 And when “construing a specific provision, we look to the statute as a whole and we may also consider statutes that are in pari materia—of the same subject or general purpose—for guidance and to give effect to all of the provisions involved.” Drummond, ___ Ariz. ___, ¶ 5, 543 P.3d at 1025 ().
- State of Arizona v. Hon. James Marner; Hanees Mohamed Haniffa 560 P.3d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
-
State of Arizona v. Hon. James Marner; Hanees Mohamed Haniffa
560 P.3d 338
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
Put simply, “[w]ords in statutes should be read in context in determining their meaning.”
- 3 Sl v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- 3 Sl v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
- Jacobsen v. Hon. beresky/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Jacobsen v. Hon. beresky/state
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“Words in statutes should be read in context in determining their meaning.” ¶ 7 (2017).
- Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg Ariz. 2024
-
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg
Ariz. 2024
¶ 7 (2017); S. Ariz. Home Builders Ass’n, 254 Ariz. at 286 ¶ 31.
- Gabriel Garibay v. Hon. Kellie Johnson William Fox, Az Constable Ethics Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
- Gabriel Garibay v. Hon. Kellie Johnson William Fox, Az Constable Ethics Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024