Cited by

Bank of Ariz., (“courts prefer to decide each case upon its merits”).

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (though courts prefer to decide each 4 HICKLE v. BARRAZA Decision of the Court case upon its merits rather than dismissing on procedural grounds, “there is a limit to which judicial leniency can be stre

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (recognizing courts prefer to decide each case upon its merits rather than dismissing on procedural grounds).

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (noting this court is “not required to assume the duties of an advocate and search voluminous records and exhibits to substantiate an appellant’s claims”).

Bank of Ariz., (“We are not required to assume the duties of an advocate and search voluminous 11 STROMBERG v. HEIRIGS Decision of the Court records and exhibits to substantiate an appellant’s claims.”).

Although we prefer to decide cases on the merits rather than dismiss on procedural grounds, “there is a limit to which judicial leniency can be stretched.” Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

Though the court could exercise its discretion to decide this appeal on its merits based on its own review of the record, “there is a limit to which judicial leniency can be stretched.” Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (recognizing courts prefer to decide each case upon its merits rather than dismissing on procedural grounds).

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

("We are not required to assume the duties of an advocate and search voluminous records and exhibits to substantiate an appellant's claims.").

See Brionna J. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, 255 Ariz 471, 478–79 ¶¶ 30–31 (2023); Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (recognizing merits decisions are preferred over dismissal on procedural grounds).

Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., –43 (App. 1984).

Failure to comply with ARCAP 13 generally results in waiver, see, ¶ 9 (App. 2022), but we have discretion to decline to apply waiver and decide a case on its merits, see Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (“We recognize that courts prefer to decide each case upon its merits rather than to dismiss summarily on procedural grounds.”)

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (recognizing courts prefer to decide each case upon its merits rather than dismissing on procedural grounds).

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (recognizing courts prefer to decide each case upon its merits rather than dismissing on procedural grounds).

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (citation omitted).

Although we prefer to decide cases on the merits rather than dismiss on procedural grounds, “there is a limit to which judicial leniency can be stretched.” Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (in our discretion, we may address the merits of waived arguments).

Although we prefer to decide cases on the merits instead of dismissing on procedural grounds, “there is a limit to which judicial leniency can be stretched.” Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

Although we “prefer to decide each case upon its merits rather than to dismiss summarily on procedural grounds,” this Court has “a responsibility” to ensure appellate briefs “conform to an acceptable, minimum level of competency and performance.” Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (courts prefer to decide cases on their merits).

Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz.

Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., -43 (App. 1984).

See Adams v. Valley Nat’l Bank of Ariz., (we are not required to carry “the banner on behalf of the ill-advised appellant”).