Cited by

¶ 29 (App. 2019) (reviewing award of fees under A.R.S.

We do not reweigh the evidence presented to the superior court but instead defer to its “determinations of witness credibility and the weight given to conflicting evidence.” ¶ 20 (App. 2019).

¶ 23 (App. 2019) (noting an appellate court “will affirm the family court’s admission of evidence absent an abuse of discretion and resulting prejudice or a mistake of law”).

“On appeal, we do not reweigh the evidence but defer to the family court’s determinations of witness credibility and the weight given to conflicting evidence.” ¶ 20 (App. 2019).

¶ 20 (App. 2019) (“On appeal, we do not reweigh the evidence but defer to the family court’s determinations of witness credibility and the weight given to conflicting evidence.”).

(courts may “make an award of money instead of merely dividing property” under A.R.S.

DISCUSSION ¶5 The court has “broad discretion to allocate community property, and we will not disturb its allocation absent an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 14 (App. 2019) (internal quotation omitted).

We do not reweigh evidence on appeal, ¶ 31 (App. 2019), and will uphold the superior court’s findings of fact absent clear error.

But the court has “broad discretion to allocate community property, and we will not disturb its allocation absent an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 14 (App. 2019) (internal quote omitted).