Cited by

Co., ¶ 6 (2008) (citation omitted).

Co., ¶ 6 (2008) (citation modified).

Cullen v. Auto-Owners Ins., Co., ¶ 7 (2008).“[M]ere conclusory statements are insufficient to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” Id.

¶10 In assessing the sufficiency of a complaint, Arizona uses a notice pleading standard, “the purpose of which is to ‘give the opponent fair notice of the nature and basis of the claim and indicate generally the type of litigation involved.’” ¶ 6 (2008).

Co., ¶ 6 (2008) (citing Ariz. R. Civ.

Co., ¶ 7 (2008) (“Arizona courts look only to the pleading itself” when “adjudicating a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.”); cf. Date Street Capital, LLC v. Clearcover Ins.

Co., ¶ 6 (2008) (“Arizona follows a notice pleading standard, the purpose of which is to ‘give the opponent fair notice of the nature and basis of the claim and indicate generally the type of litigation involved.’” (citation omitted)).

Co., ¶ 7 (2008) (cleaned up).