Cited by

(addressing an issue likely to arise on remand); ¶ 15 (App. 2019) (“Because this is an issue of law likely to arise on remand, we address it to provide guidance to the [trial] court.”); ¶ 17 (App. 2019) (same).

¶ 17 (App. 2019) (An appellate court may address issues likely to recur on remand.).

¶19 An enforceable agreement requires “an offer, acceptance, consideration, a sufficiently specific statement of the parties’ obligations, and mutual assent.” ¶ 10 (App. 2019).

¶ 17 (App. 2019) (addressing issues or arguments that “may occur on remand”).

§ 25-317(B); –45, ¶¶ 29–30, 32 (App. 2018) (superior court must independently determine whether the parties’ proposed property settlement is fair and equitable); – 31, ¶¶ 12, 16 (App. 2019) (court must have adequate record basis to assess fairness).

at 274 (finding the omission of contractual terms outlining parties’ obligations and agreements “suggests that these bills were not intended to function as contract of carriage, and that therefore they were not intended to convey liability for payment of freight charges”); ¶ 10 (App. 2019) (“For an enforceable contract to exist, there must be an offer, acceptance, consideration, a sufficiently specific statement of the parties’ obligations, and mutual assent.”) (citations omitted).

“The validity and enforceability of a contract is a mixed question of law and fact, which we review de novo.” ¶ 10 (App. 2019).

Law P. 69(c); ¶ 1 (App. 2019).

An enforceable contract requires “an offer, acceptance, consideration, a sufficiently specific statement of the parties’ obligations, and mutual assent.” ¶ 10 (App. 2019) ().

¶ 10 (App. 2019) (contracts); Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc., ¶ 3 (App. 2007) (statutes).

¶ 17 (App. 2019) (court may address issues likely to arise on remand).

¶ 10 (App. 2019) (validity and enforceability of a contract); ¶ 15 (App. 2000) (characterization of property).

DISCUSSION ¶6 “A marital separation agreement is a contract, and when a property settlement agreement is incorporated into a decree, contract law governs the agreement.” ¶ 10 (App. 2019) (internal citations omitted).

¶ 17 (App. 2019); ¶ 18 (App. 2011) (court to address issues likely to arise on remand); ¶ 98 (App. 2007).

Bank, N.A., ¶ 10 (2012), and the validity of a contract is a mixed question of law and fact that we review de novo, ¶ 10 (App. 2019).

§ 25-317(B); ¶ 18 (App. 2019).

¶ 10 (App. 2019); see also Emmons v. Super.