Cited by

We also view the evidence in the light “most favorable to sustaining the award.” Takieh v. O’Meara, ¶ 39 (App. 2021) (citation omitted).

• Stefanie states in Takieh v. O’Meara, this court “vacated sanctions where a claim, though ultimately unsuccessful, was supported by a reasonable basis.” In reality, this court upheld a sanction of attorney fees because the appellant’s claims were premised on supposition and speculation.

Takieh v. O’Meara, ¶ 11 (App. 2021).

See Takieh v. O’Meara, ¶ 34 (App. 2021) (deferring to the superior court’s decision to impose sanctions for discovery violations because that court is 4 D&D FARMS v. ALARCON, et al. Decision of the Court in a better position to determine whether dis

Takieh v. O’Meara, ¶ 11 (App. 2021).

Takieh v. O’Meara, -62, ¶ 39 (App. 2021).

Takieh v. O’Meara, –62 ¶ 39 (App. 2021).

See Takieh v. O’Meara, –63, ¶ 43 (App. 2021).

“While groundless is determined objectively, bad faith is a subjective determination.” Takieh v. O’Meara, ¶37 (App. 2021).

See Takieh v. O’Meara, ¶ 39 (App. 2021) (“We may affirm the superior court’s [§ 12-349] ruling ‘if it is correct for any reason apparent in the record.’”) ( ¶ 9 (App. 2006)).

Warne Invs., ¶ 33 (App. 2008) (Rule 59 motion for new trial); ¶ 7 (App. 2006) (Rule 60 motion for relief from judgment); Takieh v. O’Meara, ¶ 34 (App. 2021) (Rule 37 motion for sanctions).

We view “the evidence in a manner most favorable to sustaining the award and will affirm the trial court’s findings unless clearly erroneous.” Takieh v. O’Meara, –62 ¶ 39 (App. 2021) (internal quotation marks omitted).

See Takieh v. O’Meara, ¶ 13 (App. 2021) (“[B]ecause the expense of defending a meritless defamation case can have a chilling effect on First Amendment rights, the superior court must act as gatekeeper protecting the right to free speech from encroachment.”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

Takieh v. O’Meara, -62, ¶ 39 (App. 2021).

¶26 “[B]ecause the expense of defending a meritless defamation case can have a chilling effect on First Amendment rights, the superior court must act as gatekeeper protecting the right to free speech from encroachment.” Takieh v. O’Meara, ¶ 13 (App. 2021) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

See, e.g., Takieh v. O’Meara, – 5 FURST v. MAYNE/ZIA Decision of the Court 62 ¶ 39 (App. 2021); Phx.

See Takieh v. O’Meara, –63, ¶¶ 42–43 (App. 2021).