Cited by

Sec., ¶ 29 (App. 2010) 5 IN RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO A.L. and B.L.

¶28 ¶ 21 (App. 2010), contains the following quote: “[a] parent who creates barriers to contact through substance abuse cannot claim just cause for his failure to maintain a relationship.” This quote does not exist in the case.

Sec., ¶ 29 (App. 2010)) (alterations in original).

Sec., ¶¶ 27, 29 (App. 2010) (a parent’s history of drug use, positive drug tests, and failure to submit to drug testing is “evidence [the parent] has not overcome his” substance abuse, and that such abuse is chronic and would continue).

Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2010) (quotation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 30 (App. 2010)).

Sec., –77 ¶ 14 (App. 2010).

Sec., ¶ 30 (App. 2010) (citations omitted).

Sec., ¶ 30 (App. 2010); Demetrius L., 239 Ariz. at 2 ¶ 1 (holding that a juvenile court may conclude adoption is in the child’s best interests in proceedings initiated by the state or a private party).

Sec., ¶ 25 (App. 2010) (stating that when a parent has been unable “to experience sustained sobriety in a noncustodial setting, and establish the essential support system to maintain sobriety, there is little hope of success in parenting.”).

Sec., ¶ 14 (App. 2010) (“[W]e will affirm the termination if any one of the statutory grounds is proven.”).

Sec., –77 ¶ 14 (App. 2010).

Sec., ¶ 30 (App. 2010) (citations omitted).

Sec., ¶ 15 n.2 (App. 2010).

Sec., ¶ 15 n.2 (App. 2010).