Cited by

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) ("We do not reweigh the evidence."); see also Alma S. 245 Ariz. at 151, ¶ 18 ("The resolution of conflicting evidence is uniquely the province of the juvenile court, and this rule applies even when sharply disputed facts exist."

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009)).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) ("We do not reweigh the evidence.").

Sec., ¶ 31, (App. 2009).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (quotation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

Sec., 3 IN RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO C.C.

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009), we will not assume the foster parents engaged in this behavior throughout the entire dependency, or in any of the prior dependencies involving G.A.

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (cleaned up).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (“When the statutory grounds for termination are challenged, [this Court] will affirm a termination order unless .

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2009) (citation omitted), we will accept its factual findings if supported by reasonable evidence and inferences, and we will affirm the order terminating parental rights unless it is clearly erroneous, Brionna J. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –79, ¶¶ 30–31 (2023) (citations omitted).