Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Spreitz, 39 P.3d 525.

326 citing documents.

State v. Orduno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 4 (2002) (“[W]here ineffective assistance of counsel claims are raised, or could have been raised, in a Rule 32 post-conviction relief proceeding, subsequent claims of ineffective assistance will be deemed waived and precluded.”) (emphasis omitted).
State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Sanders Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Delgado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Delgado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Vasquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Vasquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 9 (2002) (holding that ineffective assistance of counsel claims will not be addressed by appellate courts in a direct appeal).
State of Arizona v. Michael Eugene Traverso Ariz. 2025
State of Arizona v. Michael Eugene Traverso Ariz. 2025
State v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 9 (2002) (“[I]neffective assistance of counsel claims are to be brought in Rule 32 proceedings.
State v. Diaz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Diaz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 9 (2002) (“[W]e reiterate that ineffective assistance of counsel claims are to be brought in Rule 32 proceedings.
State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Roberts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Frasard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Frasard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 9 (2002) (finding that ineffective-assistance-of- counsel claims must be brought in a petition for post-conviction relief).
State v. Cameron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Cameron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Sierra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Sierra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 9 (2002) (finding that ineffective-assistance-of- counsel claims must be brought in a petition for post-conviction relief).
State v. Mekeel 561 P.3d 409 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Mekeel 561 P.3d 409 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 9 (2002) (explaining that “ineffective assistance of counsel claims are to be brought in Rule 32 proceedings,” and will not be addressed on direct appeal regardless of merit).
State v. Stuebe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Stuebe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 20 (2007) (“We therefore hold, consistent with [ ¶ 9 (2002)], that a defendant may bring ineffective assistance of counsel claims only in a Rule 32 post-conviction proceeding—not before trial, at trial, or on direct review.”).
State v. Kashkool Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Kashkool Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State of Arizona v. Analysya Contreras 557 P.3d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Analysya Contreras 557 P.3d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Larry Dean Anderson 547 P.3d 345 Ariz. 2024
State of Arizona v. Larry Dean Anderson 547 P.3d 345 Ariz. 2024
Generally, “where ineffective assistance of counsel claims are raised, or could have been raised, in a Rule 32 post-conviction relief proceeding, subsequent claims of ineffective assistance will be deemed waived and precluded.” ¶ 4 (2002) (emphasis omitted).
State v. Trotter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Trotter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Dudley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Dudley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
P. 32; ¶ 9 (2002) (noting that ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be raised in Rule 32 proceedings).
State v. Threadgill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Threadgill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
P. 32.2(a)(2); ¶ 4 (2002) (“[W]here ineffective assistance of counsel claims are raised, or could have been raised, in a Rule 32 post-conviction relief proceeding, subsequent claims of ineffective assistance will be deemed waived and precluded.”) (Emphasis omitted.).
State v. Heydorn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Heydorn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Fullen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Fullen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Garland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Garland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
But “ineffective assistance of counsel claims are to be brought in Rule 32 proceedings,” and “will not be addressed by appellate courts [on direct appeal,] regardless of merit.” ¶ 9 (2002).
State v. Elia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Elia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022