Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Armando Pena, Jr., 331 P.3d 412.

131 citing documents.

DOE v. THE CORPORATION Ariz. 2026
and may look to dictionaries.” ¶ 6 (2014) (internal citations omitted).
State v. Yohannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Ortiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 5 (2014) (citing cases).
State of Arizona v. Jose Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
State of Arizona v. Jose Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
State v. Riehle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Riehle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
We review de novo whether the record had sufficient evidence for the jury to render its verdict, ¶ 5 (2014), and will affirm if substantial evidence supports the jury’s verdict, ¶ 50 (2012).
State v. Alfartousi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Alfartousi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
“We resolve any conflicts in the evidence against the defendant and view all facts in the light most favorable to supporting the verdict.” ¶ 5 (2014).
State v. Elizondo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Elizondo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Martell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Martell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Ordway Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Ordway Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In doing so, we review the evidence presented at trial to determine if “substantial evidence exists to support the jury verdict.” ¶ 5 (2014) (citation omitted).
State v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Cook Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
resolv[ing] any conflicts in the evidence against the defendant and view[ing] all facts in the light most favorable to supporting the verdict.” ¶ 5 (2014).
State v. Morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 5 (2014) (citing cases).
State of Arizona v. Dominick Cooke 562 P.3d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State v. Truong Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Truong Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶26 We review sufficiency of the evidence claims de novo, ¶ 5 (2014), and will only reverse if the verdict is not supported by substantial evidence, ¶ 27 (App. 2012).
State of Arizona v. Dominick Cooke 562 P.3d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State v. Collins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Collins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 5 (2014); Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Samia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Samia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Finch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Finch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Welvaert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Welvaert Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 5 (2014); Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. McKinley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. McKinley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Bryars Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Bryars Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Royalty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Royalty Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lohmeier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Lohmeier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State of Arizona v. George Willie Rios 528 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. George Willie Rios 528 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State v. Aguirre 527 P.3d 894 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023