Cited by

An abuse of discretion occurs when “the court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the fact necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 6 (2021).

DISCUSSION ¶7 We review the superior court’s PCR rulings for an abuse of discretion, “which occurs if the court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 6 (2021).

To prevail on such a claim, a petitioner must “demonstrate that counsel’s conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that he was prejudiced thereby.” ¶ 8 (2021) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687– 88 (1984)).

2 STATE v. JIRON Decision of the Court DISCUSSION ¶5 We review the superior court’s PCR rulings for an abuse of discretion, “which occurs if the court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 6 (2021).

if the defendant adequately explains why the failure to timely file a notice was not the defendant’s fault”); –13, ¶¶ 32–37 (2021) (recognizing A.R.S.

Hardy has not met his burden of establishing that trial counsel’s decision not to call certain witnesses, engage a handwriting expert, or move to suppress the letters was “not a tactical one but, rather, revealed ineptitude, inexperience or lack of preparation.” ¶ 10 (2021) ().

I. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel ¶10 To prevail on an IAC claim, a petitioner “must demonstrate that counsel’s conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that he was prejudiced thereby.” ¶ 8 (2021) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687–88 (1984)).

I. IAC ¶9 To prevail on an IAC claim, a petitioner must “demonstrate that counsel’s conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that he was prejudiced thereby.” ¶ 8 (2021) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687–88 (1984)).

¶12 To establish his IAC claim, Alvarez must “demonstrate that counsel’s conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that he was prejudiced thereby.” ¶ 8 (2021).

¶2 We review the superior court’s ruling on a petition for post- conviction relief for an abuse of discretion, “which occurs if the court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 6 (2021).

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689 (1984); –08 ¶ 10 (2021).

To establish an abuse of discretion, Allee must show the superior court erred or “fail[ed] to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 6 (2021).

To establish an abuse of discretion, Tupper must show the superior court erred or “fail[ed] to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 6 (2021).

DISCUSSION ¶7 We review the dismissal of a petition for post-conviction relief for an abuse of discretion, “which occurs if the court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 6 (2021).

(citations omitted); ¶ 15 (2021) (“A defendant must do more than disagree with, or posit alternatives to, counsel’s decisions to overcome the presumption of proper action.” (cleaned up)).

¶2 We review the superior court’s ruling on a petition for post- conviction relief for an abuse of discretion, “which occurs if the court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 6 (2021).

An abuse of discretion occurs when “the court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 6 (2021).

DISCUSSION ¶4 We review the superior court’s denial of a PCR petition “for an abuse of discretion, which occurs if the court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” 2 ¶ 6 (2021).

The court abuses its discretion “if the court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” 2 ¶ 6 (2021).

DISCUSSION ¶4 We review the superior court’s denial of a PCR petition “for an abuse of discretion, which occurs if the court makes an error of law or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary to support its decision.” ¶ 6 (2021).

¶ 15 (2021) (“Although an affidavit may not always be required to establish that counsel’s performance did not meet prevailing professional standards, a defendant must do more than disagree with, or posit alternatives to, counsel’s decisions to overcome the presumption of proper action.” (cleaned up) (quoting wi