Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Carver, 771 P.2d 1382.

375 citing documents.

  • State v. Gibson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
  • State v. English Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    ¶ 13 (2002); (the “[a]ppearance of interest 11 STATE v. ENGLISH Decision of the Court or prejudice is more than the speculation suggested by the defendant”).
  • State v. Alfartousi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • State v. Hamilton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • NOVALIS-MARINE v. MONASH Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
  • State v. Haddad Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    (“In Arizona, opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.
  • State v. Toney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    ¶ 22 n.8 (2009) (stating argument raised for first time in reply brief was waived because “opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised” ()).
  • State v. Backus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    Further, “[i]n Arizona, opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.” see also Ariz. R. Crim.
  • Lange v. Self Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”) (citation omitted).
  • Knight v. Elias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Knight v. Elias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim.”) (citation omitted).
  • State v. Melendez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • State v. Melendez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    ¶ 13 (2020) ( (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”)).
  • Gharadaghian v. Olives Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
  • Gharadaghian v. Olives Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”) (citation omitted).
  • Clay v. Geiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Clay v. Geiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    See id.; (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”) (citation omitted).
  • Terrell v. Beck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Terrell v. Beck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    See id.; (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”) (citation omitted).
  • State v. Ames Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Ames Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶ 13 (2020) ( (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”)).
  • State v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Estrada Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
  • Hylton v. Shinn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Hylton v. Shinn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶ 13 (2020) (“[I]f a defendant simply asserts a general claim of error on appeal and fails to develop it, a court is not obligated to consider it.”); (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”); see also In re $26,980.00 U.S. Currency, ¶ 28 (App. 2000) (this Court does not consider bald assertions offered without elaboration or citation to legal authority).
  • State v. Ballard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • State v. Ballard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    1 The December 2023 order stated as a reason for denial that Ballard used firearms during the commission of the offense.
  • State v. Interval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • State v. Interval Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    P. 32.2(a)(3); 2 STATE v. INTERVAL Decision of the Court (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes .
  • Nancy Bourke v. Roger H. Contreras 556 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
  • Nancy Bourke v. Roger H. Contreras 556 P.3d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
    Although a trial court nonetheless has discretion to consider an untimely challenge for cause, by the time a judge has heard evidence or decided the ultimate issues in dispute, “it is too late to disqualify him on the ground of bias and prejudice.” Marsin, 78 Ariz. at 315
  • State v. Borquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • State v. Borquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • State v. Givens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • State v. Givens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    ¶ 13 (2020) (“[I]f a defendant simply asserts a general claim of error on appeal and fails to develop it, a court is not obligated to consider it.”); (“Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”).
  • State v. Ferrara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.J. and A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • State v. Ferrara Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    (holding that the failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of such claim).
  • In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.J. and A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    “[O]pening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised[; f]ailure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.”
  • State v. Alvarez Bojorquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
  • State v. Alvarez Bojorquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
    To rebut this presumption, the party seeking a judge’s disqualification or recusal “must prove bias or prejudice by a preponderance of the evidence.”
  • Professional Choice v. Appel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Professional Choice v. Appel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    (“[O]pening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.
  • Arizona Republican Party v. Richer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Arizona Republican Party v. Richer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    (explaining that failure to “present significant arguments, supported by authority,” in an opening brief on a particular claim usually results in waiver).
  • State v. Cline Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • State v. Cline Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    ¶48 “Failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim.” see also Ariz. R. Crim.
  • In Re: Mh 2022-006353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • In Re: Mh 2022-006353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Acuna v. Pineda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023