Cited by

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 14 (App. 2003) as saying that an appellate court will find an abuse of discretion if a ruling was “manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.” But Burton contains none of that language.

v. Burton, ¶ 8 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 14 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

See ARCAP 11(c); ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶8 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003) (explaining when a party fails to provide a transcript on appeal, we presume the missing portions of the record would support the court's findings).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 18 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 14 (App. 2003) (citation omitted).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003) (“An appellant is responsible for making certain that the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003); see also J.F.

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003); see ARCAP 11(c) (it is appellant’s duty to order and file transcripts for appeal).

v. Burton, ¶ 18 (App. 2003) (regarding contempt).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).

v. Burton, ¶ 16 (App. 2003).