Cited by

¶ 16 (App. 2009); ¶ 27 (App. 2020).

To the extent Father argues the court should have weighed the evidence differently, this court does not reweigh evidence on appeal and gives “due regard to the [superior] court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

¶ 11 (App. 2009) (noting the superior court is required to consider all relevant factors when deciding child custody).

¶ 16 (App. 2009); see also Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., (“The trial court is not bound to accept as true the uncontradicted testimony of an interested party.”).

(change of circumstances); ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (best- interests findings); ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (credibility assessments and weighing evidence); ¶ 9 (App. 2019) (legal decision-making and parenting time); ¶ 7 (App. 2017) (child support); ¶ 20 (App. 2016) (attorney’s fees).

¶ 5 (App. 2016); ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (appellate court will affirm if “substantial evidence” supports trial court’s ruling).

To the extent that he asserts the superior court should have evaluated the evidence differently at the hearing, this court does not reweigh conflicting evidence on appeal and gives “due regard to the [superior] court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

Engstrom, 243 Ariz. at 471, ¶ 4 ( ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).

¶7 We review the superior court’s rulings on parenting time and legal decision-making for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 31 (App. 2022) (citations omitted), and will affirm those rulings if the record has substantial evidence in support, ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the [superior] court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision” or the court has committed an error of law “in the process of reaching [a] discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009) (internal quotations and citations omitted).

Even though conflicting evidence may exist, we affirm the [superior] court’s ruling if substantial evidence supports it.” ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

in the process of reaching [a] discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009).