Cited by

¶7 We review the superior court’s rulings on parenting time and legal decision-making for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 31 (App. 2022) (citations omitted), and will affirm those rulings if the record has substantial evidence in support, ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the [superior] court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision” or the court has committed an error of law “in the process of reaching [a] discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009) (internal quotations and citations omitted).

Even though conflicting evidence may exist, we affirm the [superior] court’s ruling if substantial evidence supports it.” ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

in the process of reaching [a] discretionary conclusion.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009).

¶ 16 (App. 2009) (citing cases).

is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009) (citations omitted).

“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the family court’s findings, and we also determine whether evidence in the record reasonably supports the family court’s findings.” ¶ 17 (App. 2015); ¶¶ 16, 19 (App. 2009).

¶ 4 (App. 2018); ¶ 19 (App. 2009).

¶ 16 (App. 2009) (appellate court defers to the superior court’s weighing of conflicting evidence and judging of witness credibility).

See, ¶ 16 (App. 2009); ¶ 13 (1999).

An abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision, ¶ 9 (App. 2019), or the record is “devoid of competent evidence to support the decision,” ¶ 4 (App. 2018) ( ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).

This court construes the evidence in a light most favorable to affirming the order, ¶ 14 (App. 2012) (citing cases), giving “due regard to the trial court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses,” ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

¶ 13 (App. 1998); ¶ 16 (App. 2009).

“An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision.” ¶ 19 (App. 2009) (citation omitted).