Cited by

Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –78, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).

See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 1 (App. 2017).

See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –78, ¶¶ 5–7 (App. 2017).

See id.; Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 6 (App. 2017) (recognizing “it is generally not our role to sua sponte address issues not raised by the appellant”).

See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 1 (App. 2017) (by challenging only the best-interests findings, mother “has abandoned and waived any challenge to the court’s finding of the statutory” grounds for termination).

See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –78, ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (explaining that failing to challenge the statutory grounds for termination constitutes waiver of the claim).

See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).

See Crystal D. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –78, ¶¶ 5–7 (App. 2017).

See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 1 (App. 2017) (challenging only the best-interests finding “abandon[s] and waive[s] any challenge to the court’s finding of the statutory” grounds).

Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –78, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).

See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017).

Sec., -78, ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (affirming juvenile court’s unchallenged findings of grounds for termination under A.R.S.

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (When severance may be affirmed on one of the statutory grounds, we need not consider alternative grounds.); see also Crystal D. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -58, ¶¶ 5-7 (App. 2017) (The failure to challenge one of the two prongs waives any argument to that prong.).

Alma S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –50, ¶ 8 (2018); Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 4 (App. 2017).

Cf. Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -78 ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (failing to challenge statutory ground on appeal waives argument challenging any other statutory ground as the court need only find one).

See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -78, ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (citations omitted) (affirming court’s finding of statutory ground for termination that parent failed to challenge on appeal).

See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -78, ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (citation omitted).

Ct. 353(h); Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –78 ¶ 5 (App. 2017).

See Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –78 ¶ 5 (App. 2017).

§ 8-533(B)(1); see Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –78 ¶ 5 (App. 2017).

§ 8-533(B)(8)(c) (requiring that the court find “a substantial likelihood that the parent will not be capable of exercising proper and effective parental care and control in the near future”); Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –78 ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (explaining that a party’s failure to challenge the time-in-care ground constitutes waiver and abandonment of the claim).

§ 8-533(B) (termination requires satisfying “any one of the” termination grounds and finding termination is in the child’s best interests); see also Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –78 ¶ 5 (App. 2017).

Crystal E. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 5 (App. 2017) (failing to challenge a statutory ground for termination of parental rights generally results in abandonment and waiver of that issue).