Cited by

3 CAMACHO v. BREWER Decision of the Court ¶9 As an initial matter, Camacho has not provided a transcript of the evidentiary hearing,2 and we “presume the items not included in the appellate record support a trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 11 (App. 2014).

See ARCAP 11(c); ¶ 11 (App. 2014).

¶ 11 (App. 2014); ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B).

¶ 11 (App. 2014) (citing cases).

¶19 “The general law in Arizona is that a party must timely present her legal theories to the trial court so as to give it an opportunity to rule properly.” ¶ 11 (App. 2014) (citation modified).

[A] trial court has the discretion to deny a fee request even after considering both statutory factors.” ¶ 9 (App. 2014).

See ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B); ¶ 11 (App. 2014).

¶ 11 (App. 2014) (citing cases).

We review an award of attorney fees for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 6 (App. 2014) (citation omitted), and will not reverse the award “if there is any reasonable basis for it.” ¶ 20 (App. 2011) (cleaned up).

may order a party to pay a reasonable amount to the other” for attorney fees) (emphasis added); ¶ 9 (App. 2014); ¶ 25 (App. 2022) (“Balancing and evaluating factors pertinent to an award of attorney[] fees is within the superior court’s discretion, and this court will not substitute its discretion 8