Cited by

When a party fails to provide a transcript, we “assume [it] would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”

“The Guidelines do not otherwise define ordinary and necessary business expenses.”

“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.” (citation omitted); see also ARCAP 11(c) (listing the appellant’s duty to order transcripts from the superior court).

App. P. 11(c) (appellant has a duty to order transcripts of relevant proceedings)

documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”

See ARCAP 11(c); (holding we may assume the court’s findings are supported by the record when the parties fail to provide the relevant transcripts).

See ARCAP 11(c); (holding we may assume the court’s findings are supported by the record when the parties fail to provide the relevant transcripts).

When a transcript is absent from the record, “we assume[] [it] would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”

(rejecting appellant’s challenge to evidentiary basis of trial court’s findings due to absence of transcript and holding that reviewing court “assume[s]” that missing transcript “would support the court’s findings and conclusions”).

(“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.”).

Under Rule 11, Self had to “mak[e] certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised.” (citing Ariz. R. Civ.

Ct. 604(a)(2)(G), (b)(1)(B)

(“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.

¶ 8 n.1 (App. 2005) ( ).

Although we presume that a missing transcript “support[s] the court’s findings and conclusions[,]” no such presumption applies here because the court made no findings about Father’s payment of child support during the modification proceedings.

“When a party fails to include necessary items, we assume they would support the court’s findings and conclusions.” (citation omitted); accord ARCAP 3 MORGAL v. STOBBS Decision of the Court 11(c)(1)(B).

When a party fails to provide a transcript, we must assume the court “evaluated all relevant factors and made any necessary findings to support its ruling,” Aguirre v. Robert Forrest, P.A., and that the transcripts “would support the court’s findings and conclusions,”

“The Guidelines do not otherwise define ordinary and necessary business expenses.”

("When a party fails to include [transcripts or other necessary documents], we assume they would support the court's findings and conclusions.").

(“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).

(providing that because an appellant “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [the appellate court] to consider the issues raised on appeal[,]” the appellate court will “assume” that missing portions of the record “would support t

See ARCAP 11(c)(1) (“The appellant must order transcripts of superior court proceedings not already in the official record that the appellant deems necessary for proper consideration of the issues on appeal.”); (“A party is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for us to consider the issues raised on appeal.”).