Cited by

¶ 8 (App. 2022) (arguments “not supported by adequate explanation, citations to the record, or authority” are waived on appeal); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (failure to comply with ARCAP 13 “can constitute abandonment and waiver” of claims).

¶ 8 (App. 2022) (arguments “not supported by adequate explanation, citations to the record, or authority” are waived on appeal) (citation omitted); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (failure to comply with ARCAP 13 “can constitute abandonment and waiver” of claims).

¶¶ 8–9 (App. 2022) (arguments “not supported by adequate explanation, citations to the record, or authority” are waived on appeal); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (failure to comply with ARCAP 13 “can constitute abandonment and waiver” of claims).

See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).

Determination of “the amount of damages is a question particularly within the province of the jury.” ¶ 36 (App. 2009) (citation modified).

See ARCAP 13(a)(7) (requiring parties to cite legal authority and portions of the record on which they rely); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (appellant must “present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth [his] position on the issue[s] in question”).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (“Opening briefs must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question.”).

¶ 62 (App. 2009); ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A) (requiring briefs to support arguments with citation to legal authorities).

ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A), 13(b)(1) (applying ARCAP 13(a) requirements to answering briefs); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).

ARCAP 13(a)(7); ¶ 3 IN RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO H.K.

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (“Opening briefs must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question.”).

See ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (claims waived when appellant fails to support argument with citations to the record).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (failure to present and address arguments, supported by authority can constitute abandonment and waiver of the claim).

¶ 8 (App. 2022); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).

¶ 62 (App. 2009) (citing Schabel v. Deer Valley Unified Sch.

Ct. 607(b) (applying ARCAP 13 to juvenile appeals); ¶ 62 (App. 2009) (noting 3 IN RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO I.J.

–65, ¶ 6 (2013) (stating that arguments are waived if not properly developed); ¶ 62 (App. 2009).

3 GURASHI v. INTERMOUNTAIN/ZURICH Decision of the Court ¶13 “Opening briefs must present and address significant arguments, supported by authority that set forth the appellant’s position on the issue in question.” ¶ 62 (App. 2009).