Cited by

An abuse of discretion occurs either “when the record does not support the court’s decision” or “when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision.” ¶ 9 (App. 2019).

¶ 9 (App. 2019); ¶ 19 (App. 2009).

§ 25-403.03; ¶ 15 n.6 (App. 2019).

Even though testimony elicited at the evidentiary hearing preceding the court’s temporary order might have been sufficient to rebut this presumption (a question as to which we intimate no view), “the court must make specific findings on the record that there is sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption.” ¶ 12 (App. 2019).

rt finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there has been a significant history of domestic violence.” Although “significant” is not defined by the statute, reasonable factors to consider include: “(1) [t]he seriousness of the particular incident of domestic violence, (2) the frequency or pervasiveness of the domestic violence, (3) and the passage of time and its impact.” ¶ 15 n.6 (App. 2019) (alteration in original).

(change of circumstances); ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (best- interests findings); ¶ 16 (App. 2009) (credibility assessments and weighing evidence); ¶ 9 (App. 2019) (legal decision-making and parenting time); ¶ 7 (App. 2017) (child support); ¶ 20 (App. 2016) (attorney’s fees).

An abuse of discretion occurs if the court makes an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, ¶ 9 (App. 2019), fails to consider evidence in reaching a conclusion, or makes a finding of fact that lacks substantial evidence in the record.

¶ 11 (App. 2019) (“If the court finds .

An abuse of discretion occurs when the court commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary decision, ¶ 9 (App. 2019), or the record is “devoid of competent evidence to support the decision,” ¶ 4 (App. 2018) ( ¶ 19 (App. 2009)).

They are: “(1) [t]he seriousness of the particular incident of domestic violence, (2) the frequency or pervasiveness of the domestic violence, (3) and the passage of time and its impact.” ¶ 15 n.6 (App. 2019) (noting these non- statutory “factors seem reasonable”).