Cited by

Sec., ¶ 4 (App. 2002) (“The juvenile court, as the trier of fact in a termination proceeding, is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and make appropriate findings.”).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (citing cases) (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the juvenile court ordered severance, we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (“If [the] evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the juvenile court ordered severance, we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).

Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2002) (noting that the resolution of conflicts in the evidence “is uniquely the province of the juvenile court as the trier of fact”).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the juvenile court ordered severance, we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).

Sec., ¶ 3 (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the [superior] court ordered severance, we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the juvenile court ordered severance, we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).

Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2002)).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (citations omitted).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the juvenile court ordered severance, [this Court] need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (where one statutory ground found by the superior court was proper, “we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds”) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the [superior] court ordered [termination], we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).