Cited by

–48, ¶ 13 (App. 1998); ARCAP 11(c); Burton, 205 Ariz. at 30 ¶ 16.

“We will defer to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” -48, ¶ 13 (App. 1998).

to exhaust a retirement account to support [herself].” ¶ 18 (App. 1998).

Vanwormer, 259 Ariz. at 90 ¶ 9; ¶ 13 (App. 1998).

at 522 n.1; –48, ¶ 13 (App. 1998).

¶ 13 (App. 1998); First Fin.

We review a court’s rulings on spousal maintenance for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 9 (App. 2007), and view the evidence in the light most favorable to Wife, ¶ 14 (App. 1998).

DISCUSSION ¶4 This Court views the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the decree, ¶ 2 (App. 2016), and “defer[s] to the trial court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.” ¶ 13 (App. 1998).

¶ 13 (App. 1998) (“We will defer to the [superior] court’s determination of witnesses’ credibility and the weight to give conflicting evidence.”).

We view the evidence in the light most favorable to affirming the judgment, id., and we defer to the superior court’s determinations on witness credibility, -48, ¶ 13 (App. 1998).

We review interpretations of statutes and guidelines de novo, ¶ 7 (App. 2015), but it is the superior court’s role to weigh the evidence and determine credibility, ¶ 13 (App. 1998).

¶ 21 (App. 2014); ¶ 5 (App. 1998).